Skip to main content Skip to secondary navigation

Survey Design for Acquisition of Airborne EM

Main content start
Figure 1. Conceptual diagrams of man-made noise sources of the AEM data.

The Place

Butte and Glenn Counties, located in the northern part of the Central Valley, California.

The Problem

The airborne electromagnetic (AEM) method provides a cost-effective approach for mapping out the resistivity structure of the subsurface over a large area. However, without co-located well data providing direct information about hydrology, it is very difficult to interpret the resulting resistivity structure from the AEM data. Therefore, designing an AEM survey in a way that can obtain co-located well data (e.g., within 100 m separation distance from AEM flight lines) is critical. A major roadblock to flying an AEM system over the wells is a noise source due to man-made objects (e.g., powerline, steel well casing).

Our Approach

We designed an AEM survey to fly over the available wells in the study area. This resulted in 41 water wells located within 100 m of the AEM flight lines, which provided a unique opportunity to investigate the effect of water wells on AEM data. We designed systematic numerical analyses and examinations of the field data.

Results 

We found that the only noise source related to the wells that affects the AEM signals in our study area was the power lines; the effect of the steel casings in the study area was negligible. From the numerical simulations, we found that the effect of the powerline will be observed in the AEM data until there is a separation distance of ~170 m from the power line. However, we found that, in the field data, an average separation distance between the powerline and high-quality AEM data (i.e., no impact from the power lines) is only 60% of this predicted distance. We attributed this to the high ground contact resistance caused by the degradation of the grounded electrodes located at the bottom of the power-line poles. For our 41 wells, after removing any soundings contaminated by powerline noise, we were left with high-quality soundings located 0-160 m from the water wells, with an average distance of 77 m.

Figure 2. Example high-quality AEM data close to a water well.

Project Sponsors

Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Project Publications and Presentations

 

Kang, S., Dewar, N., & Knight, R. (2020). The effect of power lines on time-domain airborne electromagnetic data. GEOPHYSICS, 86(2), E123–E141. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0089.1

 

Project Leads / Contacts

Seogi Kang

Rosemary Knight

Noah Dewar